Without a doubt, the most talked about and controversial topic surrounding live chat software is the practice of proactively inviting visitors to engage in a live chat interaction. This short whitepaper taps into Bold360's extensive research findings and professional services experiences in order to answer the five most frequently asked questions about proactive chat.
Question 1: What is Proactive Chat?
Proactive Chat - (pro-ak'tiv chat): The issuance of images, text input fields, and/or other interactive mechanisms to website visitors either through manual means or via the use of an automated rules engine with the intent of inviting the recipient into a one-on-one chat engagement.
So then, proactive chat invitations can be triggered either manually or automatically, and the form of the invitation itself can vary widely. Depending on the business, companies may choose one type over another to suit their needs.
Question 2: Don't Proactive Chat Invitations annoy website visitors and drive them away?
The short answer to this question is that a poorly done proactive chat implementation runs the risk of annoying website visitors while an expertly deployed proactive effort will drive more sales and increase customer satisfaction.
The long answer simply provides the data in support of these statements, but before diving into that, let's consider a brick and mortar analogy. Does being approached by salespeople in a store annoy shoppers and drive them away? The answer is basically the same – it depends on the strategy employed by the retailer. Knowledgeable, friendly, and timely interruptions to offer help are welcomed, while aggressive, uninformed, and inconvenient intrusions are a recipe for certain disaster.
In a recent survey conducted with over 1,000 regular internet shoppers, participants were asked to indicate their reaction to being proactively invited to chat. The majority of respondents - 62% - were receptive. (See figure below) Some sub-groups were even more welcoming:
67% of those who'd had experience with live chat were receptive and 72% that it was their preferred method of communication. Another interpretation of these findings is the reasoning that if 62% of the population is welcoming to being proactively invited, then 38% must be annoyed by it. Indeed, simple arithmetic certainly supports this theory, but additional information sheds more light upon it. When asked why survey takers had left websites after being proactively invited, not an insignificant number of survey takers stated they left because of poor invitation practices. Before deployment of a proactive invitation solution, firms should ensure they've chosen a technology which gives them enough control to alter some key components of proactive chat, such as timing and style of invitation.
Question 3: If we add Proactive Chat to our website, what impact is it likely to have on chat volume and conversions?
There are three ways to answer this question and all of them have merit. The first way relies on an analytic analysis of Bold360's entire customer base. This effort – reported in the Live Chat Performance Benchmarking Report – produced averages and confidence interval ranges for a wide variety of chat statistics. With regard to proactive chat here are some of the most salient findings:
The second way to answer the question is by way of anecdotal example. Allergy Buyer's Club is an online retailer of healthy home and allergy relief products such as air purifiers, specialty vacuums, and dehumidifiers. A longtime believer in live chat, the company has spent several years measuring and tweaking their deployment in order to turn it into a major sales channel. The effort has resulted in an implementation that by and large exceeds the aforementioned benchmarks. During one month in the beginning of their 2009 busy holiday season, the following results were reported:
This is just one of hundreds of examples of proactive chat success.
The final way for this question to be answered is for individual businesses to use Bold360's live chat volume and ROI calculator. The underpinnings of the Live Chat Performance Benchmarking Report drive the calculations and users can directly interact with a variety of assumptions.The calculator predicts the quantity of chat volume (for both reactive and proactive deployments) a website is likely to experience, the number of full time chat operators required to handle the volume, and the return on investment a firm will recognize based on their expense in live chat software license costs.
Question 4: Will proactive chat invitations be blocked by third party security software or by precautionary measures built into today's modern browsers?
If you are using Bold360's proactive invitation capability then the answer to this question is that no, triggered invitations will not be blocked. Bold360 chat invitations are simply layers of 100% HTML which pop-up blockers do not even see. Third party security products and security protocols inside browsers are focused on stopping programmatic elements which are not included in an HTML layer.
Question 5: How long does it take to implement proactive chat?
The only accurate answer is that “it depends.” If you are starting from scratch and don't currently have live chat on your website then best practices generally dictate that you implement reactive chat first, and baseline results of that implementation for one to two weeks at least.
Speaking specifically about proactive chat, depending on he number of rules you want to use, the complexity of the rules themselves, the number of invitations, and the level of customization associated with each, a solid implementation will take between 1 and 4 weeks to fully complete.
For companies that want to manage live chat like its own stand alone sales channel, their work is never done.Things change and constant vigilance around proactive messaging, timing, and countless other metrics (including integrated conversion tracking) will always be required. Through reporting features and best practices, companies who want to maximize their live chat deployments are always working at it.